Tampa Bay won 16-0 without completing a pass. The last team to do that was in 1933.
The surface story is a shutout. The real story is a box score that shouldn't exist in the modern NFL. Baker Mayfield attempted three passes and completed zero. Tampa Bay ran for every yard that mattered, with Bucky Irving and Kenny Gainwell doing the damage on the ground. The Buccaneers won anyway, 16-0, in the rain. The last time an NFL team won without a pass completion was 1933.
Buccaneers beat Falcons in historic win without a pass completion
3 sources · hover a dot to see coverage
What happened
On a rainy afternoon in Tampa, the Buccaneers defeated the Atlanta Falcons 16-0 without completing a single forward pass. Quarterback Baker Mayfield attempted three passes and completed none. Tampa Bay's offense ran the ball throughout, with running backs Bucky Irving and Kenny Gainwell carrying the load on the ground. The shutout win produced a stat line not recorded in the NFL since 1933, more than ninety years ago. Three outlets covered the game. All three led with the historical anomaly rather than the score, which is itself a signal about what made this game worth writing about.
CBS Sports put the 1933 context in the headline; others didn't
CBS Sports was the only outlet to name the historical comparison directly in its headline, framing the game as Mayfield completing a win 'with statistics not seen since 1933.' ESPN and PFT both noted the absence of pass completions but left the historical anchor for the body text. CBS also specified the three-attempt, zero-completion line explicitly. That single number, three attempts, is the detail that makes the story stranger: Mayfield wasn't just ineffective, he barely tried.
PFT called it 'one of the most shocking box scores you'll ever see'
Pro Football Talk leaned on the spectacle angle, calling the box score 'one of the most shocking you'll ever see' and noting the rain in Tampa as context. ESPN went the other direction, treating the running backs as co-leads alongside the no-completion fact, naming Irving and Gainwell in the headline. That framing gives readers a reason the Bucs won, not just a curiosity about how Mayfield didn't.
What one side told you that the other didn't
Nobody reported Mayfield's three attempts as the real story.
Zero completions is strange. Zero completions on three attempts is stranger. A quarterback who threw the ball three times in a sixteen-point win was either managing the game by design or was kept off the field intentionally. None of the three outlets explored which it was. The historical stat got the headline; the play-calling decision that produced it did not.
The Falcons' shutout loss got almost no examination.
Atlanta was held scoreless. That is also a story. All three outlets framed the game entirely through Tampa Bay's historic offensive anomaly, and none devoted meaningful space to what went wrong for the Falcons' offense. A 16-0 loss has two sides. Coverage found only one of them worth writing about.
What to watch
If the NFL or Buccaneers coaching staff addresses the three-attempt game plan in a press conference this week, expect ESPN and PFT to revisit the story with the tactical angle that was missing from Sunday's coverage. If no explanation surfaces by Wednesday, the story likely closes as a curiosity rather than a strategy piece.
See how outlets across the political spectrum framed this differently — and what each side left out.