Two red-state Democratic upsets, and Trump's fingerprints are on both losses
The surface story is two Democratic pickups in deeply red territory. The real story is that both losing Republicans were Trump-backed candidates, and both lost in states where Democrats hadn't won a Senate seat in decades. James Talarico beat Ken Paxton 58–40 in Texas; Annie Andrews beat Trump's handpicked pick in South Carolina. Three outlets, three different framings of the same underlying fact: Trump's candidate selection is losing winnable races.
South Carolina elects Democratic senator for first time in nearly three decades
1 source · hover a dot to see coverage
What happened
Two special U.S. Senate elections on the same night produced Democratic wins in states that haven't sent Democrats to the Senate in a generation. In Texas, James Talarico defeated former state Attorney General Ken Paxton 58–40, flipping a seat Democrats hadn't held in 33 years. In South Carolina, Annie Andrews defeated Darline Graham, whom President Trump had personally selected to fill the seat vacated by her brother's death. Both losing Republicans carried explicit Trump endorsements. Both winners ran in states considered safe Republican territory entering election night. Three outlets covered these races, and the framing diverged sharply on whose story this is.
Fox News put Trump's name in the headline and called it a backfire
Fox News ran: 'Trump's gamble on Ken Paxton backfires as Democrat pulls off historic Texas Senate upset.' That is not a headline that protects the president. It names Trump's agency, names the mechanism (a gamble), and names the outcome (backfire) in eleven words. Fox covered only the Texas race, not South Carolina, but the framing it chose for Texas was more critical of Trump's candidate selection than anything the left-leaning outlet produced. The corruption allegations against Paxton and 'a GOP schism' are named in the Fox excerpt as causal factors.
New Republic treated Texas as an ideological milestone, not a Trump failure
New Republic's headline: 'James Talarico Becomes First Democratic Senator in Texas in 33 Years.' The lede declares Talarico 'has officially turned Texas blue.' The framing is triumphalist and candidate-centered, with no mention of Trump's role in Paxton's nomination or the intra-party dynamics Fox named. Covering only Texas and framing it as a Democratic breakthrough rather than a Republican self-inflicted wound produces a different story from the same result.
BBC covered South Carolina; the American outlets didn't
The BBC is the only outlet in this set that reported the South Carolina result, naming Andrews by name and identifying Graham as Trump's handpicked candidate. Neither Fox News nor New Republic filed on South Carolina. A British outlet broke the pattern of American political coverage here, and its framing centered Trump's role in the loss more directly than the New Republic's Texas coverage did.
What one side told you that the other didn't
Only Fox News called Trump's candidate choices a backfire.
New Republic framed Talarico's win as a Democratic milestone. Fox framed the same race as a Trump miscalculation. The word 'backfire' in a Fox News headline about a Republican loss is not routine. It names presidential accountability directly, which the left-leaning outlet did not do. If the takeaway you want is 'Trump is picking bad candidates,' you got it more clearly from Fox than from New Republic.
American outlets ignored the South Carolina race entirely.
Fox News and New Republic both covered Texas. Neither covered South Carolina, where Trump personally selected the losing candidate to fill a dead congressman's seat. The BBC covered it. The South Carolina result is arguably the cleaner test of Trump's endorsement power, because Graham's only qualification for the nomination was Trump's blessing. That story went unreported in American outlets represented here.
No outlet put both races in the same frame.
Two Trump-backed candidates lost Senate seats in the same night in states Republicans have dominated for decades. No single outlet in this set reported both races together. Covering them separately produces two isolated upsets. Covering them together produces a pattern about candidate quality and presidential endorsement value. The pattern story wasn't written.
What to watch
Watch whether Republican leadership or Trump himself addresses the back-to-back losses before the weekend. If Trump posts on Truth Social attributing either defeat to candidate disloyalty rather than his own endorsement, right-leaning outlets will likely follow that framing and the 'backfire' language Fox used tonight will disappear from their coverage by Monday.
See how outlets across the political spectrum framed this differently — and what each side left out.